Iñaki Urdangarin has returned to the public eye and, despite being divorced from Princess Cristina, he still follows in the footsteps of his former father-in-law. Both commission agents, estranged from the Crown and socially ostracized (one paid with imprisonment; the other did not), have reappeared with an identical strategy: the publication of inconsequential biographies to whitewash their image and a complete lack of self-criticism. The former brother-in-law of King Felipe VI now insists that his sentence was "disproportionate" and conveniently forgets that it was upheld by the Supreme Court: 5 years and 8 months for proven crimes of continuous malfeasance and embezzlement, influence peddling, fraud against the Administration, and two tax offenses. Urdangarin's selective amnesia makes him forget that he paid ghost employees through Nóos, that he billed the Government hundreds of thousands of euros for consultancies that turned out to be nonexistent, and that he went from denying any oversight by the Royal Household to claiming he wouldn't take a single step without its supervision. Back then, what he and his partner were doing was still called consulting, and today, coachingIn fact, this is the future of work that is being forged. Courage is needed to hire their services. Whatever comes.

He Judge José Castro He became famous throughout Spain when he decided to seat a member of the Royal Family, Infanta Cristina, in the dock for the first time. Eleven years later, now retired, he takes stock in the book The Nóos case. The full truth behind the trial that shook Spain., and maintains that the king's younger sister actively participated in and benefited from the crimes committed by Iñaki Urdangarin.