When we think about verbs, we almost always think of those that describe actions, such as ‘sing’, ‘dance’, and ‘run’; processes, like ‘grow’ and ‘fall in love’, or states, like ‘know’ or ‘understand’. However, there are others that do not carry any implicit meaning, such as the verb ‘to be’. Let’s say we are with friends and decide to play the classic game of charades. When we read a verb similar to those in the first group on our slip of paper, we all breathe a sigh of relief: they are easily imitable verbs because a meaning can be extracted from them. Now, what happens when the word we draw is the verb ‘to be’? How can we represent verbs that do not express any action?

Among the most frequent verbs in the Catalan language is, without a doubt, 'hacer' and ''Give'. Both have full and clear uses, such as 'to do a job' (in which the verb 'to do' means "to carry out") or 'to give a book' (in which the verb 'to give' has the full meaning of "to transfer to another"), but they also participate in many expressions where the main meaning lies in the accompanying noun. When we say, for example, that we want to 'ask someone a question', the core of the action is 'question'. The same occurs in ''to pay a visit,' 'to do work,' or 'to do an analysis.' The verb 'to do' provides the verbal structure of the sentence (it marks the tense, person, and agreement), but the main semantic content (that is, the meaning) is provided by the noun.

Catalan grammatical tradition has been quite consistent in describing these verbs. Thus, 'desayunar' (to have breakfast), 'desayuno' (breakfast), 'comida' (lunch), 'merienda' (snack), and 'cena' (dinner) have been classified as intransitive verbs, that is, verbs that do not take a direct object. To give concrete examples: according to this description, in Catalan we don't 'dinam canelons' (we eat cannelloni) or 'sopam pez' (we eat fish); what we do is 'comer canelones para comer' (to eat cannelloni for lunch) or 'comer pescado para cena' (to eat fish for dinner). The verb that introduces the food is 'comida' (food), while the verb 'de comida' (food) serves to indicate the time or type of food. In Mallorca, this structure also coexists with another very common solution: 'dinam de canelons' (I eat cannelloni), 'sopam de pescado' (I eat fish), with a complement introduced by the preposition 'de' (of). This construction allows us to specify the contents of the meal without it being a direct object, which also fits with the traditional classification of these verbs as intransitive. Contemporary grammatical norms maintain this line. The Catalan Language Grammar of the IEC (2016), in fact, states that these verbs "do not admit this transitive use under any circumstances." However, any speaker knows that real language does not always follow the boundaries drawn by grammars. In everyday conversation—and also in written texts—they can appear as 'What have you eaten?' or 'We had rice for dinner yesterday.' These are not isolated errors or slips of the tongue: they are part of the living use of the language. Transitive use

This transitive usage is, in fact, explicitly included in the Valencian Normative Dictionary, with examples such as 'Hoy comemos arroz al horno' (Today we're having baked rice). Given this, the interesting question is not whether these constructions exist (of course they do), but what real weight they carry within the Catalan system and how they can be explained from a descriptive point of view.

]]>