<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Ara Balears in English - emotions]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[https://en.arabalears.cat/etiquetes/emotions/]]></link>
    <description><![CDATA[Ara Balears in English - emotions]]></description>
    <language><![CDATA[es]]></language>
    <ttl>10</ttl>
    <atom:link href="http://en.arabalears.cat:443/rss-internal" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Living on a mitre]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[https://en.arabalears.cat/opinion/living-mitre_129_5653068.html]]></link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A few years ago I read an article by <em>New York Times</em> in which one of the most common mistakes in relationships was analyzed: combating emotional distress rationally. The article emphasized the obvious error: emotions don't listen to reason, even if their causes may be real, and trying to soothe certain anxieties with meticulous arguments is as absurd as saying "but I love you" when you're doing the math to see if you can afford a second mortgage.</p>]]></description>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Joan Cabot]]></dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[https://en.arabalears.cat/opinion/living-mitre_129_5653068.html]]></guid>
      <pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Feb 2026 06:31:00 +0000]]></pubDate>
      <subtitle><![CDATA[]]></subtitle>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
