<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Ara Balears in English - chess]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[https://en.arabalears.cat/etiquetes/chess/]]></link>
    <description><![CDATA[Ara Balears in English - chess]]></description>
    <language><![CDATA[es]]></language>
    <ttl>10</ttl>
    <atom:link href="http://en.arabalears.cat:443/rss-internal" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Art and parity]]></title>
      <link><![CDATA[https://en.arabalears.cat/opinion/art-and-parity_129_5689089.html]]></link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Following the recent awarding of the prize for best novel of the year, the controversy surrounding the underrepresentation of women in the shortlist of ten nominated novels has resurfaced. Although the winner was a woman, Antònia Carré-Pons, she made sure to point out in her acceptance speech that there were only two novels written by women on the list of ten finalists (which included a novel by the author of this piece). Did it include me, or did it include my novel? Those who seem to have a certain notion of parity are the very juries that compile these lists. If women publish four out of every ten books, at least this proportion should be reflected in the awards and distinctions, unless we are being told that they do a worse job—which we perhaps cannot deduce if they are ultimately the ones honored…</p>]]></description>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Melcior Comes]]></dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[https://en.arabalears.cat/opinion/art-and-parity_129_5689089.html]]></guid>
      <pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Mar 2026 06:31:13 +0000]]></pubDate>
      <subtitle><![CDATA[]]></subtitle>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
